Indeiv
Tue Mar 17 2026 14:02:34 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)

Construction of the QED Lagrangian

Explains how to construct the Lagrangian of QED.

character

Reference: (Peskin & Schroeder, 1995)

Let us demand that the Lagrangian be invariant under the local gauge transformation of the Dirac field ψ(x)\psi(x):

ψ(x)eiα(x)ψ(x) \psi(x) \mapsto e^{i\alpha(x)} \psi(x)

and try to explicitly construct such a Lagrangian.

Motivation

As an interacting theory of the Dirac field ψ(x)\psi(x) and the Maxwell field Aμ(x)A_\mu(x), one can naively consider:

LQED=LDirac+LMaxwell+Linteraction=ψˉ(iγμμm)ψ14(Fμν)2eψˉγμAμψ\begin{align*} \mathcal{L}_{\text{QED}} &= \mathcal{L}_{\text{Dirac}} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{Maxwell}} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{interaction}} \\ &= \bar{\psi}(i\gamma^\mu\partial_\mu - m)\psi - \frac{1}{4}(F_{\mu\nu})^2 - e\bar{\psi}\gamma^\mu A_\mu \psi \end{align*}

Regardless of this specific theory, theories involving an electromagnetic field have the feature that there is no kinetic term for A0A_0, and consequently, its conjugate momentum cannot be defined. Related to this feature, states with negative norms appear in the theory. However, because the Lagrangian LQED\mathcal{L}_{\text{QED}} is locally gauge invariant, such physically meaningless states do not contribute to observables. Thus, a natural question arises: are there any locally gauge-invariant theories other than QED? As shown here, the answer is No.

Terms without derivatives can be easily constructed, for example:

mψˉ(x)ψ(x) m\bar{\psi}(x)\psi(x)

However, the derivative of ψ(x)\psi(x) in the direction of nμn_\mu is

nμμψ=limϵ0ψ(x+ϵn)ψ(x)ϵ n^\mu\partial_\mu\psi = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \frac{\psi(x+\epsilon n) - \psi(x)}{\epsilon}

so ψ(x+ϵn)\psi(x+\epsilon n) and ψ(x)\psi(x) transform differently, and μψ(x)\partial_\mu\psi(x) does not transform simply like ψ(x)\psi(x) does.

Thus, we introduce a function U(y,x)U(y,x) that obeys the following transformation rule under local gauge transformations:

U(y,x)eiα(y)U(y,x)eiα(x)(1) U(y,x) \mapsto e^{i\alpha(y)} U(y,x) e^{-i\alpha(x)} \tag{1}

Then, it can be seen that U(x+ϵn,x)ψ(x)U(x+\epsilon n,x)\psi(x) transforms in the exact same way as ψ(x)\psi(x) under local gauge transformations.

Therefore, we define the covariant derivative as follows:

nμDμψ(x)limϵ0ψ(x+ϵn)U(x+ϵn,x)ψ(x)ϵ n^\mu D_\mu \psi(x) \coloneqq \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \frac{\psi(x+\epsilon n)-U(x+\epsilon n,x)\psi(x)}{\epsilon}

To make its action more explicit, expanding U(x+ϵn,x)U(x+\epsilon n,x) gives

U(x+ϵn,x)=1ieϵnμAμ(x)+O(ϵ2)(2) U(x+\epsilon n,x) = 1 - ie\epsilon n^\mu A_\mu(x) + \mathcal{O}(\epsilon^2) \tag{2}

Here ee is a constant introduced for convenience, and Aμ(x)A_\mu(x) can be regarded as a new vector field called a gauge field. Substituting this into the definition of the covariant derivative yields

Dμψ(x)=μψ(x)+ieAμ(x)ψ(x) D_\mu \psi(x) = \partial_\mu \psi(x) + ie A_\mu(x)\psi(x)

Furthermore, substituting equation (2) into equation (1) shows that the gauge field Aμ(x)A_\mu(x) transforms under local gauge transformations as

Aμ(x)Aμ(x)1eμα(x) A_\mu(x) \mapsto A_\mu(x) - \frac{1}{e}\partial_\mu \alpha(x)

From this transformation rule, we can verify that Dμψ(x)D_\mu\psi(x) transforms in the same way as ψ(x)\psi(x) under local gauge transformations.

Therefore, to construct a locally gauge-invariant Lagrangian, it is necessary to:

To interpret Aμ(x)A_\mu(x) as a physically meaningful vector field, a kinetic term for Aμ(x)A_\mu(x) is also needed. To construct this term, it is useful to look at the following transformation rule:

[Dμ,Dν]ψ(x)eiα(x)[Dμ,Dν]ψ(x) [D_\mu,D_\nu]\psi(x) \mapsto e^{i\alpha(x)}[D_\mu,D_\nu]\psi(x)

From this transformation rule, it can be seen that

Fμν[Dμ,Dν]=ie(μAν(x)νAμ(x)) F_{\mu\nu} \coloneqq [D_\mu,D_\nu] = ie(\partial_\mu A_\nu(x) - \partial_\nu A_\mu(x))

is invariant under local gauge transformations. This quantity is called the field strength. Therefore, to construct a locally gauge-invariant Lagrangian, it is necessary to:

From the above, the renormalizable, locally gauge-invariant Lagrangian is

L=ψˉ(iDμm)ψ14(Fμν)2+cϵαβμνFαβFμν \mathcal{L} = \bar{\psi}(i\cancel{D}_\mu - m)\psi - \frac{1}{4}(F_{\mu\nu})^2 + c\epsilon^{\alpha\beta\mu\nu}F_{\alpha\beta}F_{\mu\nu}

The last term breaks parity and time-reversal symmetries, so if these discrete symmetries are required, it becomes

LQED=ψˉ(iDμm)ψ14(Fμν)2 \mathcal{L}_{\text{QED}} = \bar{\psi}(i\cancel{D}_\mu - m)\psi - \frac{1}{4}(F_{\mu\nu})^2

The two free parameters are the mass mm and the coupling constant ee to the gauge field AμA_\mu. Such a theory is called Quantum Electrodynamics (QED).

References

Peskin, M. E., & Schroeder, D. V. (1995). An Introduction to quantum field theory. Addison-Wesley.